Wednesday, October 23, 2019

Explain the ethical significance of the Sermon Essay

The Sermon on the Mount is one of the key sections of the New Testament, in which Jesus builds upon the Decalogue to form the first blueprint of Christian ethics. Jesus was preaching in direct contrast to the Greek philosophy of stoicism, which sought to separate man from his emotions. Emotions, especially love, feature heavily in the Sermon on the Mount. It remains ethically relevant over 2000 years later for many reasons, the first of which is the underlying principles behind it. Jesus did not come to abolish Old Testament law, but to fulfil it. The Jews were trapped in a system of harsh legalism, where obedience was motivated by fear rather than love. The Pharisees made a grand display of holiness by keeping the law, but the Sermon on the Mount teaches that their hearts were empty. Jesus built on the Ten Commandments to create a system ruled by mercy, love and dedication to God. Even if the culture changes the basic ethical principles behind the sermon do not change. It is a moral code that focusses as much on inward moral disposition as it does our external actions: Jenkins wrote, â€Å"inner attention and attitude is crucial. † Even if a typically good action is performed with sinful thought then it becomes immoral. The most important thing to realise about the Sermon on the Mount is that it is impossible for anyone to keep it completely, as it demands perfection. Although they will never be free from sin in this life, Christians use the sermon in order to try and become more like Jesus, who was perfect. The Sermon is all about Christian sanctification. Jesus speaks not only on what Christians should do to be moral, but he also explains why it is important to be ethical in the first place. He states that Christians are the salt and light of the world. Salt is significant because it represents purity, preservation and flavour. Therefore we understand that Christians should maintain a good ethical code in order to set an example to society and to preserve it from total corruption. The image of the light is also key: in the Bible light always symbolises joy and blessing. A light is visible to all, and so the Christian should seek to make Christ visible to all through their actions. A light is also a warning, representing the Christian’s duty to lovingly warn their fellow-men about their sin. Further on in the Sermon Jesus admonishes that, â€Å"If the light then within you is darkness, how great is that darkness! † Furthermore, the Sermon on the Mount gives many specific examples of Christian ethics, the first of which is regarding murder. Jesus equates anger to murder, and speaks of the fires of hell. This is contrary to the contemporary universalist view of Jesus and his death which has led some scholars to claim that when he speaks of hell it is merely metaphorical. Regardless, Jesus is affirming that you cannot be right with God until you are right with your fellow men, which all relates to the salt-and-light reputation of a Christian. Jesus also teaches about adultery and sexual morality. Again he equates the inward sin of lust to the outward sin of adultery. He also declares that marrying a divorced woman counts as adultery, a part of the Sermon that even Christians have begun to disregard. This is contrary to the Old Testament where Moses permitted – but did not command – divorce due to the hard heartedness of the people. The close relationship between a husband and wife mirrors the relationship Christ shares with his Church, which is why sex features so highly in Christian ethics. Love, when fully understood. Is opening oneself to another completely and can succeed only where trust and fidelity are present. Subsequently, another part of the Sermon on the Mount that is ethically significant would be where Jesus deals with how we should relate to other people. The standards set by Jesus are so high it is easy for Christians to look down upon those that are struggling. Jesus, ever a carpenter’s son, uses the metaphor of the speck in your brother’s eye and the plank in your own. We are all sinners and it would be highly hypocritical to judge another when we are also flawed. We never know the whole story about someone and it is impossible to be impartial in our judgement. The Jews were familiar with the concept of loving your neighbour and not judging him, but they did not feel the same about their enemies. Jesus commanded us to show agape love towards our enemies. Such love does not naturally come from the heart, but is instead must be put into action through one’s own will. As Jesus was merciful and forgiving to sinners, so we should be. This is vital to Christian ethics. Another ethical aspect of how we relate to other people is how we treat those who are poorer than us. It is not enough to simply preach to them, but we must take care of their physical needs as well as spiritual. Jesus said, â€Å"Give to him who asks of you, and do not turn away from him who wants to borrow from you. † Charitable giving was a fundamental part of Jewish life, but Jesus added another element: it was only ethical if done with the correct motivation. The Greek word translated as hypocrite in the Bible literally means ‘actor’. This is why Jesus commands us to give in secret, lest we become boastful. Moreover, there is a definite eschatological aspect to the Sermon on the Mount as it draws to a conclusion. This emphasises to the Christian how their ethics are eternally significant and will be considered on the Day of Judgement. Jesus states that few will enter the Kingdom of Heaven and that not all that profess to believe in him as Lord will be saved. He warns of false prophets who will come in sheep’s clothing; in this situation the ethics presented in the Sermon on the Mount are vital so a Christian can identify who is a true believer. We are not saved by works, but they are an important part of our Christian identity. The Sermon on the Mount also has certain evangelical tones throughout. It shows the unbeliever what is required of them if they follow Jesus, and the severe consequences if they do not. Spurgeon wrote of this passage, â€Å"The shepherd best discerns his own sheep, and the Lord, Himself alone knows infallibly them who are His. † To conclude, there are conflicting theories regarding the nature of the Sermon – certain theologians such as Calvin believe it is a compilation of many separate sermons. Others debate technical details, such as whether it was preached on a mount or a plain. However, something that every Christian will agree on is that the Sermon on the Mount is of the upmost important as a foundation for Christian ethics. Stott said, â€Å"The Sermon on the Mount is probably the best-known part of the teaching of Jesus, thought arguably it is the least understood, and certainly it is the least obeyed. †

Tuesday, October 22, 2019

Free Essays on The Phases Of Hamlet

The protagonist of Shakespeare’s Hamlet is an extremely layered and complicated character. He has been studied for years by scholars and average readers alike and all come to the agreement that Shakespeare’s incredible skill makes Hamlet’s character and personality. There’s always more than meets the eye. In our drama literature class we have discussed the progression of Hamlet through three main phases. These phases are inspired by the plot in which his character falls: from pre-murder and speculation to climactic action. Hamlet 1 represents the Hamlet before his father’s murder. He is a university student who loves to study and is devoted to philosophical questions. He’s very calculated, analytical, and intelligent. Hamlet 2 refers to Hamlet after his father’s murder. He becomes obsessed with proving the murderer and is often perceived as mad. He is no longer very logical and over analyzes situations always thinking and never acting. Hamlet 3 represents the Hamlet who is aware of Claudius’ guilt. He is brash and full of anger and passion. His actions often occur with little or no premeditation, yet he always acts. It is almost a foil of Hamlet 1, his original self. The murder of the King strikes Hamlet at a very personal level. Being an intellectual person, when he drives himself near mad with obsession, it is one of analytical thought, monologued debates, and elaborate scheming. Hamlet will sometimes wander from his state of obsessive rhetorical questions, to logical analysis but never farther until later in the play. Hamlet, although fond of questions that can’t be answered (his soliloquies about suicide, death and the afterlife) needs to be certain of the murderer. Suspicion or reasonable doubt will not suffice. So when his elaborate scheme of the play within a play is carried out and Claudius’ question of guilt is then answered with certainty, Hamlet 3 immerges as he follows the King into ... Free Essays on The Phases Of Hamlet Free Essays on The Phases Of Hamlet The protagonist of Shakespeare’s Hamlet is an extremely layered and complicated character. He has been studied for years by scholars and average readers alike and all come to the agreement that Shakespeare’s incredible skill makes Hamlet’s character and personality. There’s always more than meets the eye. In our drama literature class we have discussed the progression of Hamlet through three main phases. These phases are inspired by the plot in which his character falls: from pre-murder and speculation to climactic action. Hamlet 1 represents the Hamlet before his father’s murder. He is a university student who loves to study and is devoted to philosophical questions. He’s very calculated, analytical, and intelligent. Hamlet 2 refers to Hamlet after his father’s murder. He becomes obsessed with proving the murderer and is often perceived as mad. He is no longer very logical and over analyzes situations always thinking and never acting. Hamlet 3 represents the Hamlet who is aware of Claudius’ guilt. He is brash and full of anger and passion. His actions often occur with little or no premeditation, yet he always acts. It is almost a foil of Hamlet 1, his original self. The murder of the King strikes Hamlet at a very personal level. Being an intellectual person, when he drives himself near mad with obsession, it is one of analytical thought, monologued debates, and elaborate scheming. Hamlet will sometimes wander from his state of obsessive rhetorical questions, to logical analysis but never farther until later in the play. Hamlet, although fond of questions that can’t be answered (his soliloquies about suicide, death and the afterlife) needs to be certain of the murderer. Suspicion or reasonable doubt will not suffice. So when his elaborate scheme of the play within a play is carried out and Claudius’ question of guilt is then answered with certainty, Hamlet 3 immerges as he follows the King into ...

Monday, October 21, 2019

Your Guide through the Receptionist Interview Maze

Your Guide through the Receptionist Interview Maze Are you on the hunt for the perfect receptionist position? Finding the ultra-competitive job search jungle a bit daunting? Best-Job-Interview.com helps you catapult to the front of the interview pack with an inside look at the sort of questions you can expect on the big day.Your potential next boss will want to know if you have the experience to hit the ground running and start making his or her office run smoothly and efficiently from day one. Expect to hear the following questions: â€Å"What were your primary responsibilities?,† â€Å"How many calls did you take on an average day in your last job?,† â€Å"What sort of people did you interact with on a daily basis?,† and â€Å"What sort of inquiries did you have to handle?†They’ll also want to know if your receptionist skills are top notch, so be ready for the following sorts of questions as well: â€Å"What are the most important skills for a receptionist?† and â€Å"What computer skills do you have?†Great receptionists can always think fast on their feet, multi-task like champs, and come up with effective strategies for handling any situation. Therefore, expect interview questions designed to task your on-the-job behavior and ability to think fast when it’s needed: â€Å"Tell me about a recent situation where you had to handle a difficult customer?,† â€Å"Describe how you organize your tasks for the day?,† â€Å"Tell me about a tough problem you had to sort out recently,† and â€Å"Can you give me an example of where you used your initiative in your previous job?†Beyond a great receptionist background and stellar skills, potential employers will want to know if they’re hiring someone with a motivated and positive work attitude and ethic. After all, receptionists are typically the face of the organizations they work for and have to work with every department and person in the office. Be prepared to hear the following questions on the day of your interview: â€Å"Why do you want to work as a receptionist for this company?† and â€Å"What do you like and dislike about working as a receptionist?†Now that you know the sort of questions you should expect when you’re on an interview you should invest some time leveraging your experience and skill set to craft the perfect responses to dazzle potential employers. Forewarned is forearmed!

Sunday, October 20, 2019

Analyse Principles Of Christian Giving Religion Essay Essays

Analyse Principles Of Christian Giving Religion Essay Essays Analyse Principles Of Christian Giving Religion Essay Paper Analyse Principles Of Christian Giving Religion Essay Paper Introduction Frank Jabini ( 2009 ) , How to Give Joyfully discusses rules of Christian giving. I will summarize the major instructions of the book. He places accent on the importance of being faithful stewards of what God entrusts to us. Biblical support will be given to the chief rules that will be discussed. My church s learning about giving, in the visible radiation of the rules in Jabini, will be discussed. Similarities and differences will be indicated. Where there are differences I will bespeak the position I consider most Biblical and why. My ain wonts with regard to giving will be evaluated and I will depict how the book affected my ain thought about giving. This resolved to alter in my ain giving wonts, I will bespeak what I intend to alter and what caused me to take that determination. Jabini s rules about giving Jabini ( 2009:1 ) says we can take our billfolds to the Lord gleefully. This is the cardinal message of the book. Jabini s principals can be sum-ups under the followers: Misconceptions about giving Jabini ( 2009: 12 ) explains that the Bible does non learn us that 10 % is the per centum that we should give. God s people gave more than 10 % on a regular footing by giving three types of tithes. In add-on to tithes they gave assorted freewill offerings from their first fruits. It is non true that you have to give when and how God moves your bosom. It has to be done on a regular basis ( like supplication ) . You can non be excessively hapless to give. Jesus told the narrative about the widow, who gave her two coins, to exemplify this ( Luke 21:2-4 ) . When we give to the Lord, it is because God is the proprietor of everything we have. We acknowledge His ownership by giving Him the first and the best of all that He gives us. ( Jabini: 2009 ) Motivations for giving A echt retainer of the Lord will non give because of greed to anticipate anything in return but will admit them as God s gifts to His people, free of charge ( Matt. 10:8 ) ! Jabini ( 2009 ) gives four motivations for giving: The first motivation for giving is: gratefulness. In the Old Testament Abel gave a freewill offering to the Lord ( Gen 8:21 ) . As an act of worship Noah made an offering of thanksgiving when he walked out of the Ark. Israel offered forfeits of Thanksgiving ( Lev. 1 ) . Christian should give themselves to the full and wholly to the Lord ( Rom 12:1-2 ) . God wants our whole lives ( Rom 6:13 ; 19 ) . Harmonizing to the New Testament our congratulationss ( Heb 13:13 ) and our money ( Phil. 4:18 ; Heb. 13:16 ) should be given to God as a forfeit of gratefulness because He has done great things in our lives. ( Jabini: 2009 ) . Gratitude to those who have fed us spiritually is the 2nd motivation. In the Old Testament God commanded Israel to give their first tithe to the demand of the Levites ( ( Lev. 27:30-32 ; Num. 18:21, 24, 26-28 ) . The first fruit was for the priests ( see Lev. 2:14 ; Num. 18:8-20 ) In the New Testament God ordains that those who preach the good intelligence should be supported by those who benefit from it ( 1 Cor. 9:14 and Gal. 6:6 and 1 Tim. 5:17 ) . ( Jabini: 2009 ) The 3rd motivation is love and compassion for the needy. God cares about the hapless, orphans and widows. In the Old Testament He asked the people of Israel to give a tithe to them ( Deut. 26:12 ) . God s people has a duty towards the needy and He wants them to give liberally, non merely leftovers ( Deut. 15:10 ) In the New Testament Paul devotes two chapters to promote the church of Corinth to give toward the demands of the hapless in Jerusalem ( 2 Cor. 8-9 ) . Jabini ( 2009 ) calls on us to give joyful to the needy in our local churches. ( Jabini: 2009 ) Fourthly we give because we have a passion that the ministry of the Gospel would be advanced. Believers in Philippi set a good illustration. By directing money to Paul he could transport on prophesying the Gospel in Thessalonica. In Phil. 4:16 he thanked them. ( Jabini: 2009 ) In drumhead, Jabini ( 2009 ) says the following must steer us in giving to the Lord: Gratefulness to Him Gratitude toward His workers Love and compassion for the needy Passion for the promotion of the ministry of the Gospel. ( Jabini: 2009 ) Motivations for giving Harmonizing to Jabini ( 2009 ) another four things should be our motive for giving. In the first topographic point God has given us the illustration. God is the proprietor of everything. All that I am and have belongs to Him ( 1Chr. 29:14 ; 1 Cor. 6:19-20 ; Ps 24:1 ) . Money does non possess me. God gave His best His lone boy ( John. 3:16 ) . Jesus gave His life ( Mark 10:45 ) . The Holy Spirit gave me gifts ( 1 Cor. 12:11 ) . We should follow His illustration by giving the best! ( Jabini: 2009 ) Second, God commands us to give. It is compulsory ( 1 Cor. 16:2 ; 2 Cor. 8:7 ; Heb. 13:16 ) . ( Jabini: 2009 ) Third, we could follow the illustration of Godly leaders, like David, who gave copiously ( 1Chr. 29:2 and 1 Chr. 29:3-5 ) . ( Jabini: 2009 ) Fourthly, Jabini ( 2009 ) says giving has a positive consequence on our religious life. Giving brings religious approval. It will take the focal point from the earthly towards the heavenly and protect us against the love for money ( 1Tim. 6:10 ) . If our hoarded wealth is in Eden, our Black Marias will be at that place ( Matt. 6:19-21 ) . ( Jabini: 2009 ) To summaries our motives forgiving: God s illustration God commands us. The illustration of Godly leaders A positive consequence in our religious lives. ( Jabini: 2009 ) Methods of giving Jabini ( 2009 ) points out that even though we focus on money and material ownerships in the stuff, we should besides give clip, gifts and organic structure ( all ) to the Lord. God want us to give our best and our first, non leftovers like Abel in Gen. 4:4. Paul instructed the Corinthians to give regular and systematic ( 1 Cor. 16:2 ) . ( Jabini: 2009 ) We should give mandatary and voluntarily. We should give cheerfully ( God loves cheerful givers ) ( 2 Cor. 9:7 ) We should give sacrificially ( 2 Cor. 8:3 ) We should give volitionally ( Exod. 25:2 ) We should give candidly ( non like Ananias and Sapphira ) ( Acts 5:1-11 ) We should give on a regular basis and consistently ( 1 Cor. 16: 1-2 ) ( Jabini: 2009 ) The hapless ( 2 Cor. 8:9 ; Luke 21:2-4 ) and the rich ( 2 Cor. 19:1-10 ; 2 Cor. 8:14 ) should give. Giving is a affair of our attitude. We should react with generousness when God s people are in demand. Our local church and community is our first duty. ( Jabini: 2009 ) Mercy of giving When we give, our religious life is affected. We grow when we give. We focus on Eden and God alternatively of earthly ownerships ( Matt. 6:19-21 ) . Giving frees us from the love of money ( Matt. 19:21 ) . The Old and New Testament promise that God will bless those who give ( Luke 6:38 ) . ( Jabini: 2009 ) Decision Giving is a privilege and a bid. God wants His people to give gleefully to His causes, back up His worker and back up His work. He uses His kids as instruments of blessing to the needy. We all have something different to give ( Lev. 1:9 ; 13 ; 17 ) . We should inquire ourselves: What is my part at this phase? ( Jabini: 2009 ) My church s learning about giving My church understands that it has a responsibility in assisting the members become the best Christian he/she can be. Therefore it helps and advice the members on the affair of giving by scriptural instructions out of God s word and their illustration. The best manner they teach the right attitude and values of giving is by reflecting a perfect illustration in the manner that they as an administration manage the fold s money, Gods manner. Our leaders set good illustrations, merely as the scriptural leaders, that we can follow. ( David: 1Chr. 29:3-5 and 1 Chr.29:6-8 ) . The money of our church is handled by known and trusted people, full of the Spirit and wisdom ( Acts 6:2-3 ; 2 Cor.8:18 ; 2 Cor. 8:21-22 ) . Our church works really responsibly and be after each twelvemonth s budged decently. Proverbs 24:27 besides teach us that. They make proviso in the budged to pay all costs and to give money in a regular and systematic manner to all the assorted ministries. Like Paul taught the Corinthians in 1 Cor. 16:2. Congregation members are encouraged to pay their tithe on a regular basis and consistently by manner of debit orders. During services or particular occasions people are besides encouraged to give voluntary gifs by agencies of self-generated gifts of thanksgiving. A scriptural illustration of this is Cain in Gen 4:3-5. As Cain we have to give the best with the right attitude ( Luke 21:2-4 ) fluxing out of gratefulness and worship to God. Congregation members are bucked up and supported to non merely gleefully give money but besides clip, cognition or whatever you can offer for the good of the Kingdom. The fold is besides encouraged to give ownerships ( other than money ) if particular undertakings arise out of demand. As the Israelites brought the stuff for the edifice of the Tabernacle ( Exod. 25:2 ; 35:29 ; 36:5, 7 ) . In the annually budged proper proviso is made for missionaries and people who work in ministry. This shows a passion for the ministry of the Gospel. The trusters in Philippi set a good illustration in this respect as they supported Paul ( Phil 4:16 ) . Our church has assorted ministries where the demands of the hapless every bit good as the demands of the fold members are addressed ( Gal 6:10 ; 1 Tim 5:4-5, 9, 16 ; Acts 2:44-45 ) They help people to see the beatitude of generous and adoring giving. By giving we know we are hive awaying up hoarded wealths in Eden ( Matt.6:19-21 ) and this makes us free from the love of money ( Matt 19:21 ) . To us giving is an escape of God s grace and redemption ( John 12:1-3 ) . I believe my church does hold a good scriptural learning about giving. After reading Jabini ( 2009 ) I can see that our church succeeds in making most of the scriptural principals Jabini ( 2009 ) pointed out. Our church gives cheerfully and prayerfully out of gratefulness to Him who is the proprietor of all we are and have. ( Dutch Reformed Church ) My strong beliefs about giving I can truly attest that taking the principals of Jabini to bosom, over the past few months, truly changed my life. I have ever been good at giving liberally but I discovered I have room for much betterment. I have neer consciously separated myself from perfectly everything I am, and have, by puting it back in the custodies of God. Just for a minute to state: I will be ( and have ) nil without Your grace and approval in my life GOD! Confessing that all I am and have does non truly belong to me. I realized that God entrusted me with everything and I have a duty on how I receive and manage it. Let me explicate the deduction of to the full giving back to God. Over the past two old ages God helped me with the most hard thing to consciously allow travel my kids. As they grow up and leave the house you realise that you can non ever have control over their protection. This was an easy undertaking when they were small. I am so thankful that God taught me that I was non the one prot ecting them in any instance. After being taught to put your kids s protection in His custodies, how hard could it be to consciously put earthly ownerships in His custodies? With His grace and the strength of the Holy Spirit I will confidently state: I trust you God. It was within this bare, hapless and delicate province that I discovered the true significance of giving gleefully . I have ever been highly blessed my whole life. For this I will be everlastingly thankful. I am besides thankful that God has given me a sensitive bosom to acknowledge agony and non to take anything I have for granted. During the last six months we have experienced fiscal trouble because of a really expensive house we have in Cape Town that we could non pull off to sell. I have besides experienced God s celestial proviso. For six months we, and everybody we know, were praying but perfectly nil happened. I could non understand why God did non reply our supplications. He provided miraculously in the most unexpected ways to cover our deficits and He gave us the peace that Phil 4:7 speaks about but still perfectly nil ( except ailments ) happened on the house. One twenty-four hours after reading in Jabinis book I prayed the supplication where I placed all that I have in the custodies of God. That same twenty-four hours our estate agent called and informed me that everybody in their office had been speaking about a unusual thing that had happened. Their phones had been lifelessly soundless for the past few yearss but all of a sudden the phone could non halt pealing with questions about Fairwinds 41 . The first offer that came in was for precisely the sum we advertised. The offers had been coming in of all time since and are waiting in line. I have learned so many lessons through this experience. I have even received really gracious approvals through this. I am genuinely thankful for all the approvals in my life particularly the religious approvals that I receive when God reveals His truth to me. He is my loyal defender and my gracious supplier. I choose to swear Him. Knowing this, I will be the faithful and obedient steward of that which the Lord entrusted to me. I will take Jabinis rules to bosom and pattern them. God will give me the counsel, wisdom and the strength to cognize how and where to give gracefully. Decision There are many lessons to be learned from the principals in Jabinis book. I am really thankful that my church besides teaches the same principals. Personally I have grow from the lessons that I have learned. It will give me the greatest joy describable to give!

Saturday, October 19, 2019

Religious Studies Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Religious Studies - Essay Example Religious Definition by Steve Bruce: In his book â€Å"God is Dead: Secularization in the West†, 2002, Steve Bruce defines religion as â€Å" beliefs, actions and institutions predicated on the existence of entities with power of agency (that is gods) or impersonal powers or processes possessed of moral purpose (the Hindu notion of Karma), which can set the conditions of, or intervene in human affairs†. Comparison of the Definitions: My definition starts with the element of sharing, whereas in the definition of Steve Bruce there is no element of sharing. From the perspective of individuality and extreme secularization the element of sharing in my definition is a weakness. It makes it necessary that religion is not individualistic, but a shared activity of a group. From my perspective I do not find this a weakness. Social living is an essential part of human existence. Social interaction and society developed from sharing of common factors that bound a group of humans together, which included religion. With time, in more advanced societies tolerance of members with belief in other religions became a norm and so no longer was it necessary that all members of a society or community shared the same religion. Still religion is shared and is not an individualistic belief and action, as even Steve Bruce makes institutions a necessary part of religion. In my definition religion needs to answer the purpose of existence and having served this purpose to the satisfaction of the almighty, what happens after death.

Friday, October 18, 2019

Uncertainty Avoidance and Country Risk Ratings Dissertation

Uncertainty Avoidance and Country Risk Ratings - Dissertation Example Despite the importance of these country risk ratings, the utility of these measures for predicting market volatility has been called into question (DiGregorio, 2005; Oetzel et al, 2001) while global debt crises have occurred that have been likened to a heart attack for the international financial system (Gokay & Whitman, 2010).   Current literature on country risk ratings indicates a focus on political, financial, and economic factors without inclusion of social or cultural factors (Miroshnik, 2002). Description of the Population and Sample In selecting the sample size three factors into consideration and the study came up with a sample size which will consist of a total of 49 countries including Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Denmark, Ecuador, El Salvador, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iran, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, and Venezuela.   This sample surpasses the minimum required sample size as computed from G*Power, which should reduce the possibility of committing Type II errors when running the analyses.   Data from the samples will be collected from the International Country Risk Guide database, Euro money Country Risk score database, Hofstede Uncertainty Avoidance Index databas e, and the World Bank databases. Table 4.1 Economic indicators and the previous year country risk ratings.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚      Years compared    Predictors 2007 ? 2008 2007 ? 2009 2008 ? 2009 2008 ? 2010 2009 ? 2010                      Euromoney .998*** .906*** .908***          Intl Country Risk Guide .982*** .959*** .965***          Economic indicators                                     Export growth       .132   Ã‚  Ã‚   .090 -.240    Ratio current account to GDP       .878*** .826*** .910***    Growth foreign exchange       .039*** .181*** .695***    Inflation       .892*** .867*** .950***    GDP per capita       .994*** .991*** .994***    Combined indicators       .528*** .445** .732***    **p< .01, ***p< .001, all 2-tailed. Source: International Country Risk Guide database To confirm the applicability of factor analysis a t-test was carried out at 95% confid ence level. The table above shows all the identified economic factors that could probably affect a country’s risk ratings. The test results are only significant if the p-value or the significance value of the test is lower than .05.   The t-test statistics (table above) shows that all identified

Theory Lab Report Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Theory - Lab Report Example This is affected by electron intensity. If for example the intensity of the electrons is significantly high, there may be a lot of scattering which may produce a result which is far from what is expected. This is used to estimate the formation porosity and the formation density. Through the use of the litho-density the fluid type can also be established. The pore space of the oil and gas is also measured through the litho-density log. This refers to the amount of pores that are in a volume of a solid which is porous in nature. In this case, the value of the porosity is measured as a percentage. However, the true porosity includes the volume of the pores that are sealed. Clean formation is usually more than shales. As a result of this the bulk density will read less than the actual density. Therefore, the density porosity which is computed will be higher in terms of shales as compared to the actual porosity. The SP and GR log complement each other in the sense that Sp log uses electrical charge for the purpose of recording whereas the GR uses Gamma rays. Both of these measure different attributes which are existent in the well. These logs would not be advisable in situations where there is excessive radiation or electrical charge in the well. This is because these may cause fault in the equipment. They are, however, advocated in situations where the quantities of such attributes are average. The quality of caliper in this section will be low. This is because the porosity will take away a significant amount of materials from the region. The result of this is reduced quality of rock and